From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Mehta

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 20, 2013
2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2013)

Opinion


CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES, Plaintiff, v. DEEPAK MEHTA, et al., Defendants. No. 2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. May 20, 2013

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel. The parties came before the court on May 10, 2013, at which time defense counsel Mitchell A. Wrosch agreed to share Dr. R. Ranade's in camera declaration which was filed in support of defendant Dr. Uppal's motion for a protective order, with the other attorneys in this case subject to a protective order. Thereafter, confusion has arisen as to whether the court had issued a protective order on the record during the hearing. Defense counsel Wrosch has since filed a proposed protective order. Counsel for plaintiff has also filed a motion seeking sanctions for defense counsel's alleged failure to timely turn over Dr. R. Ranade's declaration.

         Under these circumstances, and in the interest of justice, the court will issue the following protective order and deny plaintiff's motion for sanctions.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The Declaration of R. Ranade, M.D., dated April 25, 2013, and titled "Declaration of R. Ranade, M.D., In Support Of Motion For Emergency Protective Order To Prevent The Deposition Of Defendant R. Uppal" ("Ranade Declaration") is designated as confidential and/or proprietary nature as "CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" (hereinafter "Attorneys' Eyes Only Material"). Attorneys' Eyes Only Material, and the information contained therein, shall be disclosed only to the Court, and to counsel for the parties (including the paralegal, clerical, certified law students, and secretarial staff employed by counsel), but shall not be disclosed to a party, unless otherwise agreed or ordered. If disclosure of Attorneys' Eyes Only Material is made, all other provisions in this Order with respect to confidentiality shall also apply;

         2. Confidential documents shall be so designated by stamping copies of the document produced to a party with the legend "CONFIDENTIAL." Stamping the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" on the cover of any multipage document shall designate all pages of the document as confidential, unless otherwise indicated by the producing party;

         3. Material designated as confidential under this Order, the information contained therein, and any summaries, copies, abstracts, or other documents derived in whole or in part from material designated as confidential (hereinafter "Confidential Material") shall be used only for the purpose of prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action, and for no other purpose;

         4. The Confidential Material produced pursuant to this Order may be disclosed or made available only to the Court, or to counsel for a party (including the paralegal, clerical, certified law students, and secretarial staff employed by counsel);

         5. If the Declaration of R. Ranade, M.D., dated April 25, 2013, titled "Declaration of R. Ranade, M.D., In Support Of Motion For Emergency Protective Order To Prevent The Deposition Of Defendant R. Uppal" ("Ranade Declaration") is included in any papers to be filed in Court, such papers shall be labeled "Confidential - Subject to Court Order, " and filed under seal;

         6. In the event that the Declaration of R. Ranade, M.D., dated April 25, 2013, titled "Declaration of R. Ranade, M.D., In Support Of Motion For Emergency Protective Order To Prevent The Deposition Of Defendant R. Uppal" ("Ranade Declaration") is used in any court proceeding in this action, it shall not lose its confidential status through such use, and the party using the material shall take all reasonable steps to maintain its confidentiality during such use;

         7. This Order shall be without prejudice to the right of the parties (i) to bring before the Court at any time a question of whether any particular document or information is confidential or whether its use should be restricted or (ii) to present a motion to the Court under FRCP 26(c) for a separate protective order as to any particular document or information, including restrictions differing from those as specified herein. This Order shall not be deemed to prejudice the parties in any way in any future application for modification of this Order;

         8. This Order is entered solely for the purpose of facilitating the exchange of documents and information between the parties to this action without involving the Court unnecessarily in the process. Nothing in this Order nor the production of any information or document under the terms of this Order nor any proceedings pursuant to this Order shall be deemed to have the effect of an admission or a waiver by any party or of altering the confidentiality or nonconfidentiality of any such document or information or altering any existing obligation of any party or the absence of obligation;

         9. This Order shall survive the final termination of this action, to the extent that Declaration of R. Ranade, M.D., dated April 25, 2013, titled "Declaration of R. Ranade, M.D., In Support Of Motion For Emergency Protective Order To Prevent The Deposition Of Defendant R. Uppal" ("Ranade Declaration") is not or does not become known to the public, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve any dispute concerning the use of information disclosed under this Order;

         10. Upon termination of this case, Plaintiff's counsel and co-Defense counsel shall return the Declaration of R. Ranade, M.D., dated April 25, 2013, titled "Declaration of R. Ranade, M.D., In Support Of Motion For Emergency Protective Order To Prevent The Deposition Of Defendant R. Uppal" ("Ranade Declaration") designated as confidential and all copies of same, other than papers on file with the Court, or shall certify the destruction thereof;

         11. Notwithstanding the foregoing, counsel shall be permitted to retain a copy of each document filed with the Court or served in this proceeding, including correspondence with opposing counsel, which copies shall remain subject to the terms of this Order; and

         12. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions (Doc. No. 125) is denied.


Summaries of

James v. Mehta

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 20, 2013
2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2013)
Case details for

James v. Mehta

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES, Plaintiff, v. DEEPAK MEHTA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 20, 2013

Citations

2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2013)