From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Mehta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 29, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P

04-29-2013

CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES, Plaintiff, v. DEEPAK MEHTA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel. The parties have filed a stipulation requesting that the court modify the scheduling order in this action.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to extend discovery (Doc. No. 104) is deemed withdrawn;

2. The parties shall disclose any expert witnesses on or before June 30, 2013;

3. The parties shall complete all expert and non-expert discovery and file all non-dispositive motions on or before August 30, 2013;

4. The parties shall file any dispositive motions on or before October 30, 2013; and

5. Except as otherwise stated in this order, the court's February 15, 2013 scheduling order remains in effect.

____________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

James v. Mehta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 29, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2013)
Case details for

James v. Mehta

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES, Plaintiff, v. DEEPAK MEHTA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 29, 2013

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2013)