From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Maynard

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 1, 2011
433 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6369.

Submitted: May 26, 2011.

Decided: June 1, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-02885-AW).

Corey Lamonde James, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Corey Lamonde James appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. James v. Maynard, No. 8:09-cv-02885-AW, 2011 WL 743814 (D. Md. filed Feb. 22, 2011; entered Feb. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

James v. Maynard

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 1, 2011
433 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

James v. Maynard

Case Details

Full title:Corey Lamonde JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary D. MAYNARD; Gene M…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 1, 2011

Citations

433 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Russell v. Stirling

First, as to Russell's due-process claims, courts have consistently held that because prisoners have no…

Harrell v. Stirling

First, as to Harrell's due-process claims, courts have consistently held that because prisoners have no…