From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Oct 21, 2010
Case No. 1:09cv673 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 21, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09cv673.

October 21, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on September 22, 2010 (Doc. 39).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5) is DENIED as moot; Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Injunction (Doc. 24) are DENIED as moot; and Defendant's Application for Entry of Default (Doc. 27) is DENIED. Plaintiff will have until October 25, 2010 within which to file an answer or pleading in response to Defendant's Counterclaim which is consistent with the Opinion of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit


Summaries of

James v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Oct 21, 2010
Case No. 1:09cv673 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 21, 2010)
Case details for

James v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Caesarea Develle James, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Oct 21, 2010

Citations

Case No. 1:09cv673 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 21, 2010)