From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Duluth Clinic

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT
Jan 8, 2019
921 N.W.2d 555 (Minn. 2019)

Opinion

A18-1498

01-08-2019

Daniel S. JAMES, Respondent, v. DULUTH CLINIC, Relator, BRAC, Administrator.

Eric W. Beyer, SiebenCarey, P.A., Duluth, Minnesota, for respondent. Edward Q. Cassidy, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relator.


Eric W. Beyer, SiebenCarey, P.A., Duluth, Minnesota, for respondent.

Edward Q. Cassidy, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relator.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 21, 2018, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).Employee is awarded $3,500 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ ______________________________

G. Barry Anderson

Associate Justice


Summaries of

James v. Duluth Clinic

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT
Jan 8, 2019
921 N.W.2d 555 (Minn. 2019)
Case details for

James v. Duluth Clinic

Case Details

Full title:Daniel S. James, Respondent, v. Duluth Clinic, Relator, BRAC…

Court:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT

Date published: Jan 8, 2019

Citations

921 N.W.2d 555 (Minn. 2019)