From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Constar Fin. Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 28, 2022
2:22-cv-00018-SSS-PVCx (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00018-SSS-PVCx

07-28-2022

Kyle James v. Constar Financial Services, LLC


Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES- GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S REASSIGNMENT ORDER

On June 25, 2022, the Court entered its Reassignment Order (the “Order”) [Dkt. 27], that 1) informed the parties of the case reassignment; 2) provided this Court's location; 3) provided the parties vital information on previously scheduled deadlines and dates and how this Court would be addressing those deadlines and dates; 4) directed each party to review and become familiar with any all applicable standing orders; and 5) ordered the parties to file a joint case management statement within fifteen days from the date of the Order. As of today's date, Plaintiff has failed to file the Court-ordered case management statement.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff-Kyle James-to show cause why he should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for his failure to comply with the Court's Reassignment Order.

Plaintiff is required to respond in writing on or before August 18, 2022, at 12:00 noon. Plaintiff's failure to respond, or Plaintiff's filing of an unsatisfactory response, may result in the imposition of sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

James v. Constar Fin. Servs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 28, 2022
2:22-cv-00018-SSS-PVCx (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2022)
Case details for

James v. Constar Fin. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:Kyle James v. Constar Financial Services, LLC

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 28, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00018-SSS-PVCx (C.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2022)