From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-00664 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-00664 MCE DAD P

01-30-2013

WILLIAM JAMES, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The parties have filed a stipulation and proposed order modifying the scheduling order filed on September 12, 2012 in this action. The parties intend to participate in voluntary mediation on March 25, 2013 and request that the deadline to file and serve dispositive motions therefore be extended to May 17, 2013. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The parties' January 28, 2013 request to modify the court's scheduling order (Doc. No. 50) is granted;

2. The court's scheduling order, filed on September 12, 2012, is modified as follows: The March 22, 2013 deadline to file and serve all pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, is vacated and the deadline to file and serve for all pretrial motions is reset for May 17, 2013. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 7 of the court's order filed August 3, 2011.

______________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

James v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-00664 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2013)
Case details for

James v. Cnty. of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JAMES, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2013

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-00664 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2013)