From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 17, 2020
Civil No. 20-cv-1240 (PJS/HB (D. Minn. Jun. 17, 2020)

Opinion

Civil No. 20-cv-1240 (PJS/HB

06-17-2020

Joseph Alan James, William Marks, and Tony Stonell, Plaintiffs, v. Bureau of Prisons, FMC Lexington; and Francisco Quintana, Warden, Defendants.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).

3. The pending motions of Plaintiffs Joseph Alan James, William Marks, and Tony Stonell [Doc. Nos. 2, 3, 6 and 24] are DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: June 17, 2020

/s/_________

PATRICK J. SCHILTZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

James v. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 17, 2020
Civil No. 20-cv-1240 (PJS/HB (D. Minn. Jun. 17, 2020)
Case details for

James v. Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Alan James, William Marks, and Tony Stonell, Plaintiffs, v. Bureau…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jun 17, 2020

Citations

Civil No. 20-cv-1240 (PJS/HB (D. Minn. Jun. 17, 2020)