From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Birkholz

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 3, 2022
CV 22-03897-RGK (SK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-03897-RGK (SK)

11-03-2022

Damian James v. B. Birkholz

Connie Chung


Connie Chung

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE: STEVE KIM, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner's opposition to Respondent's motion to dismiss was due on October 28, 2022. Petitioner has also failed to notify the court of a change in his address of record. Thus, the petition is subject to dismissal either because Petitioner has consented to the granting of the motion to dismiss by not timely opposing it or because he has failed to prosecute this action by not keeping the court informed of any change in address. See Local Rules 41-6, 7-12. Petitioner is thus ordered to show cause in writing by no later than December 1, 2022 why the petition should not be dismissed for either these reasons. Petitioner may discharge this order by filing a notice of voluntary dismissal using the attached Form CV-09, or by filing his opposition to the motion to dismiss by December 1, 2022. In any case, Petitioner must notify the court of any address change as soon as possible. Failure to comply with this order will lead to involuntary dismissal of the entire action.


Summaries of

James v. Birkholz

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 3, 2022
CV 22-03897-RGK (SK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

James v. Birkholz

Case Details

Full title:Damian James v. B. Birkholz

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

CV 22-03897-RGK (SK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2022)