From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 3, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-253 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-253

02-03-2012

ERROL F. JAMES, II v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration


ORDER

AND NOW, this 2nd day of February, 2012, upon consideration of the plaintiff's request for review, defendant's response thereto, and plaintiff's reply, and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa and the plaintiff's objections thereto and the defendant's response to plaintiff's objections, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff's Request for Review is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

_________________

J. CURTIS JOYNER, C.J.


Summaries of

James v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 3, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-253 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2012)
Case details for

James v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ERROL F. JAMES, II v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 3, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-253 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Serrano v. Kijakazi

Courts in this district have held that, although an ALJ may not be required to enforce a subpoena he or she…

Gartland v. Colvin

The court in McKinnon v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., found that "[e]ven though the SOC is not specifically listed…