From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James K. v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 29, 2019
File No. 18-cv-00822 (ECT/DTS) (D. Minn. Jun. 29, 2019)

Opinion

File No. 18-cv-00822 (ECT/DTS)

06-29-2019

James K., Plaintiff, v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has received the June 13, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. ECF No. 16. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) or Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(a); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 16] is ACCEPTED;

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 11] is DENIED;

3. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 14] is GRANTED; and

4. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: June 29, 2019

s/ Eric C. Tostrud

Eric C. Tostrud

United States District Court


Summaries of

James K. v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 29, 2019
File No. 18-cv-00822 (ECT/DTS) (D. Minn. Jun. 29, 2019)
Case details for

James K. v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:James K., Plaintiff, v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jun 29, 2019

Citations

File No. 18-cv-00822 (ECT/DTS) (D. Minn. Jun. 29, 2019)