Jain v. Barker

Full title: USHA JAIN, M.D. AND MANOHAR JAIN, Appellants, v. DAVID BARKER, MARY-BETH…

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 11, 2022

No. 5D21-791 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 11, 2022)

Opinion

5D21-791

01-11-2022

USHA JAIN, M.D. AND MANOHAR JAIN, Appellants, v. DAVID BARKER, MARY-BETH VALLEY, MICHAEL FURBUSH AND ROETZEL & ANDRESS, L.P.A., Appellees.

Andrew B. Greenlee, of Andrew B. Greenlee, P.A., Sanford, for Appellants. Thomas P. Wert, of Dean, Mead, Egerton, Bloodworth, Capouano & Bozarth, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees David Barker and Mary-Beth Valley. Michael J. Furbush, of Dean, Mead, Egerton, Bloodworth, Capouano & Bozarth, P.A., Orlando, pro se. No appearance on behalf of Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A.

PER CURIAM.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Jeffrey L. Ashton, Judge. LT Case No. 2016-CA-7260-O

Andrew B. Greenlee, of Andrew B. Greenlee, P.A., Sanford, for Appellants.

Thomas P. Wert, of Dean, Mead, Egerton, Bloodworth, Capouano & Bozarth, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees David Barker and Mary-Beth Valley.

Michael J. Furbush, of Dean, Mead, Egerton, Bloodworth, Capouano & Bozarth, P.A., Orlando, pro se.

No appearance on behalf of Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, NARDELLA and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.