From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaffee v. New York Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 15, 1994
202 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 15, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.).


Since the complaint was served more than 10 years after the alleged misdiagnosis on May 25, 1980, as well as more than 10 years after the return visits in 1980, all claims relating to those visits were properly dismissed as time barred (CPLR 208), even if those visits constituted, as plaintiff contends, "distinct" acts of malpractice. In any event, the record indicates that the 1980 return visits were for continuous treatment of the original diagnosis of H. influenza meningitis and septic arthritis; as the IAS Court noted, "[b]ased on Daniel J. v. New York City Health Hospitals Corp., 77 N.Y.2d 630 (1991) the infant toll (CPLR 208) and the continuous treatment toll (CPLR 214-a) do not run consecutively".

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Asch, Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Jaffee v. New York Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 15, 1994
202 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Jaffee v. New York Hospital

Case Details

Full title:JANE JAFFEE, as Mother and Natural Guardian of JASON CLAIBORNE, an Infant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 15, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 658

Citing Cases

Mortman v. Christine E. Burbige, Burbige, Kevin A. Burbige, M.D., P.C.

Here, defendants' motion must be granted as the action is barred by the statute of limitations. CPLR §208…

John Doe v. Yeshiva

The other proffered interpretation, that the 10-year period is to be added on at majority, finds no support…