From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jafco Realty Corporation v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1964
198 N.E.2d 39 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Argued February 17, 1964

Decided February 27, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, RONALD E. COLEMAN, J.

Joseph Swart and Adrian Block for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Jean M. Coon and Paxton Blair of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, and judgment absolute directed against appellant on the stipulation in the following memorandum: The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, and, pursuant to the terms of the stipulation for judgment absolute, the claim should be dismissed. We agree with the conclusion reached by the Appellate Division. The provision in the appropriation map "reserving" certain rights effected a reservation of the easement granted to the claimant's predecessor in interest by the City of Buffalo and it follows that, if the State later interferes with the claimant's access to its waterfront property, the State will have to answer for a de facto appropriation.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Jafco Realty Corporation v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1964
198 N.E.2d 39 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

Jafco Realty Corporation v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:JAFCO REALTY CORPORATION, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 27, 1964

Citations

198 N.E.2d 39 (N.Y. 1964)
198 N.E.2d 39
248 N.Y.S.2d 651

Citing Cases

Kravec v. State of N.Y

The easement here is not so restricted. Under its terms claimants have the right to use their property…

Weber v. State

" The appropriation did not specifically provide for access to claimants' lands, as did the prior taking, but…