From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacques v. Fleuren

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 21, 1988
136 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

January 21, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rensselaer County (Keniry, J.).


Plaintiffs, husband and wife, as tenants of certain real property owned by defendant Joan M. Fleuren in the City of Troy, Rensselaer County, seek damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of the leakage of carbon monoxide gases into their apartment emanating from the furnace and heating system in the basement of the dwelling.

The record demonstrates that the carbon monoxide was a product of combustion in a basement gas furnace using natural gas furnished by defendant Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (hereinafter NIMO) and diverted into plaintiffs' living quarters by a plugged or clogged chimney which forced the gaseous matter back into the building. There is no showing of any prior notice to NIMO of this condition until January 23, 1985, the date on which plaintiffs first advised NIMO of the discernible odor of gas in their dwelling, following which NIMO personnel immediately "tagged" the furnace and shut off gas to it.

We perceive no basis upon which to hold NIMO responsible for plaintiffs' injuries, for a utility company is not liable for the escape of gas from a heating system (see, Reid v Westchester Light. Co., 236 N.Y. 322; cf., Lockwood v Berardi, 135 A.D.2d 881). NIMO neither installed nor serviced the heating system in question; thus, there was no obligation to inspect such equipment flowing from NIMO to plaintiffs (see, Pernick v Central Union Gas Co., 183 App. Div. 543, affd 228 N.Y. 594). Moreover, there is no allegation or proof of any latent danger or defect in the product distributed by NIMO which would trigger any duty to warn plaintiffs of a potential hazard (see, Cooke v Bernstein, 45 A.D.2d 497, 500).

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jacques v. Fleuren

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 21, 1988
136 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Jacques v. Fleuren

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED L. JACQUES et al., Appellants, v. JOAN M. FLEUREN, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1988

Citations

136 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Jacques v. Fleuren

Decided June 2, 1988 Appeal from (3d dept: 136 A.D.2d 850) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…

Famularo v. Havasi

Contrary to the plaintiff's arguments, there is nothing in the record from which it could be inferred that…