From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacqueline v. New York City Housing Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 1992
181 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 31, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.).


Plaintiff, a minor, alleges that on April 25, 1989, she was raped and sodomized in her mother's apartment, owned by defendant Housing Authority. By order to show cause dated April 26, 1990, plaintiff sought leave to serve a late notice of claim on the Housing Authority, arguing that it had actual notice of the underlying facts by virtue of an extensive investigation by the police, and the reporting of the incident in contemporaneous news accounts. Plaintiff also offered the report of a psychologist stating that she interviewed plaintiff on September 10, 1990, and is of the opinion that plaintiff remained dazed and confused for a long time after the incident and was just beginning to recover from a traumatic stress disorder that had "incapacitated her emotionally and mentally for well over a year".

Here, as in Joseph v New York City Hous. Auth. ( 179 A.D.2d 441), "[t]he reports of the occurrence to respondent were sufficient to constitute actual notice, even though there is no indication that petitioner's report connected the criminal activity to a lack of security". And, also as in Joseph, the report of the psychologist suffices to show plaintiff's incapacity to seek timely legal advice. In view of the actual notice of the incident, the lack of prejudice, and the excuse given for the delay, the application was properly granted.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Jacqueline v. New York City Housing Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 1992
181 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Jacqueline v. New York City Housing Auth

Case Details

Full title:JACQUELINE G. et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
582 N.Y.S.2d 109

Citing Cases

Price v. Herstic

Except for plaintiff's conclusory allegations of depression, no plausible explanation has been provided why…

Hilda v. New York City Housing Authority

Further, a three page report from a psychologist who saw the adult petitioner, submitted upon the motion,…