From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacome v. IRS of Cal.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 16, 2021
21-cv-02083-JLS-MSB (S.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-02083-JLS-MSB

12-16-2021

ALEXANDER JACOME, Petitioner, v. IRS OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Hon. Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a Petition under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, but has failed to pay the $402.00 civil filing fee or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1.) Because this Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the civil filing fee or qualified to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court hereby DISMISSES the case without prejudice. To have this case reopened, Petitioner must submit, no later than January 14, 2022, a copy of this Order with the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jacome v. IRS of Cal.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 16, 2021
21-cv-02083-JLS-MSB (S.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Jacome v. IRS of Cal.

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER JACOME, Petitioner, v. IRS OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Dec 16, 2021

Citations

21-cv-02083-JLS-MSB (S.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2021)