From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacobson v. 142 E. 16 Cooperative Owners

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 2002
295 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1407

June 18, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about December 19, 2001, which, to the extent appealed from, denied in part defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

PATRICIA ANN GRANT, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

STEPHEN VLOCK, for Defendants-Appellants.

Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Rosenberger, Marlow, JJ.


Plaintiff, in his first cause of action, alleges, in part, that defendants, through their agents or employees or both, failed to repair the water leaks in his apartment, and that defendants hired an incompetent contractor to do roof, exterior and terrace repairs and did not inspect and/or supervise the contractor's work. These allegations state a cognizable claim for relief even if an independent contractor performed the allegedly defective work. Pursuant to Multiple Dwelling Law § 78(1) defendant landlord and managing agent were under a nondelegable duty to maintain the premises at issue, "including its roof or roofs, and every part thereof and the lot upon which it is situated . . . in good repair," and are thus "vicariously liable for any negligence on the part of the independent contractor" in effecting repairs (Dowling v. 257 Assocs., 235 A.D.2d 293). Defendants, in moving for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, have not met their burden to demonstrate a prima facie case of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Vitiello v. Mayrich Constr. Corp., 255 A.D.2d 182, 183-184; Chiambalero v. Waldbaum's Supermarket, Inc., 250 A.D.2d 360). The scant appellate record does not permit adjudication of whether defendants were careless in hiring the independent contractor or in inspecting or supervising its work, or of whether any such negligence resulted in financial harm to plaintiff. We also note plaintiff has not yet had discovery of defendants.

Motion seeking leave to strike brief denied.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Jacobson v. 142 E. 16 Cooperative Owners

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 2002
295 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Jacobson v. 142 E. 16 Cooperative Owners

Case Details

Full title:LAURENCE E. JACOBSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. 142 E. 16 COOPERATIVE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 18, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
743 N.Y.S.2d 500

Citing Cases

Liberman v. Cayre Synergy 73rd LLC

Plaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment as to liability on the negligence claim as against the sponsor…

Globespan Telecomm., LLC v. 65 Broadway, LLC

Thus, a negligence cause of action is legally sufficient without a showing of a landlord-tenant relationship…