From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacobs v. RJAK Enterprises Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 1996
226 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 29, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed, as the judgment was superseded by the order made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff ( see, Mirand v. City of New York, 84 N.Y.2d 44, 50), we find that the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence ( see, Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 499). Moreover, the verdict was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence ( see, Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 134).

We have reviewed the defendants' remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jacobs v. RJAK Enterprises Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 1996
226 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Jacobs v. RJAK Enterprises Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RENEE JACOBS, Respondent, v. RJAK ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 531

Citing Cases

Weinstein v. Breitbart

Since the evidence revealed that the client consented to the fee-sharing agreement and the referring…