From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacobs v. Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 2, 2023
3:21-cv-01687-WHO (N.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2023)

Opinion

3:21-cv-01687-WHO

10-02-2023

SCOTT CROCKER JACOBS, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

RE: DKT. NO. 63

William H. Orrick, United States District Judge

The parties gave notice of a conditional settlement on March 6, 2023, to be completed within 60 days. Dkt. 61. Because no notice of dismissal or other activity appeared on the docket since that date, I issued an Order to Show Cause regarding why this case should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Dkt. 63. The parties were ordered to respond by September 26, 2023. They have not done so.

Therefore, under Federal Rule 41(b), this case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jacobs v. Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 2, 2023
3:21-cv-01687-WHO (N.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Jacobs v. Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT CROCKER JACOBS, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 2, 2023

Citations

3:21-cv-01687-WHO (N.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2023)