From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacobs v. Cirnigliaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 1995
221 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 6, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.).


Ordered that, on the Court's own motion, the appellant's notice of appeal from so much of the order as granted the branch of the defendant's motion which was to strike scandalous and prejudicial material from the complaint is treated as an application for leave to appeal and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further;

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that there are issues of fact regarding the value, if any, of the plaintiff's purported legal services to the defendant. Thus, the branch of the plaintiff's cross motion which was for summary judgment on the causes of action to recover for those services was properly denied (see, CPLR 3212 [b]).

A review of the plaintiff's pleadings supports the striking of the scandalous and prejudicial material in the complaint and the award of attorney's fees of $2,500 to the defendant (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]). Balletta, J.P., O'Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jacobs v. Cirnigliaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 1995
221 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Jacobs v. Cirnigliaro

Case Details

Full title:DAVID B. JACOBS, Appellant, v. LINDA CIRNIGLIARO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 478

Citing Cases

Jacobs v. Cirnigliaro

However, contrary to the plaintiff's claim, the court did not err in denying his motion for summary…