From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacobo v. Hernandez

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Oct 4, 2021
21-cv-1113-JLS-AGS (S.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-1113-JLS-AGS

10-04-2021

Luis JACOBO, Plaintiff, v. Rogelio HERNANDEZ, Nicholas Uhde, Christian Ayala, Defendants. CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE DISCOVERY LIMITATIONS


NOTICE AND ORDER 1 GRANTING MOTION ECF 9, 2 VACATING DATES, 3 FOR EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION, AND 4 SETTING RULE 26 COMPLIANCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Hon. Andrew G. Schopler, United States Magistrate Judge

An Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference will be held by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on November 19, 2021, at 200 p.m. Notwithstanding the pendency of any motion, the parties must timely comply with the following dates, deadlines, and mandatory instructions

1. Mandatory Zoom Appearances : All parties and lead attorneys must appear by way of the Zoom videoconference program at the ENE. A party that is a business, organization, or other entity must have at least two people appear at the ENE: (1) the party's representative (someone other than the lead attorney) who has full settlement authority and (2) its lead attorney. In addition, anyone else needed to authorize full settlement must appear. Government entities are excused from this personal-appearance requirement, so long as their lead attorney appears in person and has the power to recommend a resolution to the ultimate settlement authority. All participants must clear their schedules for the entirety of the day.

2. Interpreters : If a party is not fluent in English, that party's counsel must ensure that an appropriate Court-certified interpreter appears in person at the ENE. If a non-English-speaking party is not represented by counsel, that party must ensure that an appropriate Court-certified interpreter appears in person at the ENE.

3. Notice of Settlement Impediments : To avoid wasting the Court's and parties' time and resources, the parties must inform the Court of any serious impediments to settlement discussions, especially impediments that will prevent a party from making a meaningful offer or counter-offer at the ENE. If either party identifies such an impediment, it shall so inform the Court at the earliest possible opportunity, but no later than the deadline for the Joint Discovery Plan or ENE Statement. If a party chooses to inform the Court of such settlement impediments in its ENE Statement or the Joint Discovery Plan, that information must appear in a clearly labeled “Settlement Impediments” section. Depending on the nature of the impediment, the Court may set a telephonic status conference, reschedule the ENE, or take other action.

4. ENE Statements : By the below-listed date, the parties must email their ENE statements to efileschopler@casd.uscourts.gov. Each statement, which is limited to five pages, must outline:

a. All ENE attendees for that side, including their names, titles, and positions.
b. The nature of the case, including the claims and defenses.
c. The requested settlement terms. These settlement terms may be attached as an addendum or exhibit, rather than included in the five-page ENE statement. But the requested settlement terms must include:
(1) A specific financial demand or offer (or a detailed explanation of why a financial demand or offer cannot be made), and
(2) All other settlement terms (for example, confidentiality, tax treatment, employment retention/termination, etc.).

If exhibits are attached and the total submission amounts to more than 20 pages, a courtesy hard copy must also be delivered directly to Chambers. At their discretion, the parties may choose to share their statements with opposing counsel or to keep them confidential.

5. Case Management : The parties' request to vacate the current dates (ECF 9) is GRANTED. Instead, a Joint Discovery Plan must be filed on the CM/ECF system as well as lodged with Judge Schopler by emailing the Plan to efileschopler@casd.uscourts.gov as set out below. If the Plan with its attachments exceeds 20 pages, a courtesy paper copy must be delivered to Judge Schopler's Chambers. If the parties wish to modify the tentative discovery dates or limitations listed below (confirmed dates are boldfaced; tentative dates are not), the Plan must set forth case-specific good cause for the proposed modifications.

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE

Event

Deadline

Rule 26(f) Conference

November 3, 2021

Rule 26 Initial Disclosures

November 5, 2021

Joint Discovery Plan

November 10, 2021

ENE Statements

November 10, 2021

ENE and CMC

November 19, 2021, at 2:00 p.m.

Motions to Amend

January 22, 2022

Expert Witness Designations and Disclosures

April 1, 2022

Rebuttal Expert Witness Designations and Disclosures

April 29, 2022

Fact Discovery Completion

May 27, 2022

Expert Discovery Completion

May 27, 2022

MSC Statements

June 10, 2022

Mandatory Settlement Conference

June 17, 2022, at 9:00 a.m.

Pretrial Motions

June 24, 2022

Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures

September 29, 2022

Meet and Confer on the PTO

October 6, 2022

Draft PTO to Defense Counsel

October 13, 2022

Lodge PTO

October 20, 2022

Final Pretrial Conference

October 27, 2022, at 1:30 p.m.

DISCOVERY LIMITATIONS

Discovery Type

Restriction (Per Side)

Depositions

No more than 6

Requests for Admission

No more than 25

Interrogatories

No more than 25

Requests to Produce Documents

No more than 25

6. Magistrate Judge Consent Forms : If all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge exercising jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings, including trial, each party must provide plaintiffs counsel with an executed copy of the attached consent form. Plaintiff should file these consent forms in paper format at the Clerk's Office as soon as possible. See Local Civil Rule 73.1. The consent forms should not be filed with the court electronically. The parties are free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. In fact, unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, no judicial officer will be informed about the consent forms or their contents. Questions related to the consent forms should be directed only to the Clerk's Office at (619) 557-5600. Please do not call Chambers' staff with questions on this issue.

7. Notice to New Parties : If any parties respond to the complaint after today's date, plaintiffs counsel must promptly notify them about the ENE and this Order.

8. Pre-ENE Settlement : If the parties resolve the matter, they must telephone Judge Schopler's Chambers as soon as possible. In order for the ENE to be vacated and personal appearances excused, the parties must:

a. File a Joint Motion to Dismiss and separately email the assigned District Judge a proposed order; or
b. File a Settlement Notice containing the electronic signatures of counsel for all settling parties; or
c. Obtain Court approval to vacate the ENE and avoid personal appearances, by explaining in the telephone call to Judge Schopler's Chambers the extraordinary circumstances that prevent the parties from complying with options a or b, above.

NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Notice of a magistrate judge's availability. A United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including a jury or nonjury trial) and to order the entry of a final judgment. The judgment may then be appealed directly to the United States court of appeals like any other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily consent.

You may consent to have your case referred to a magistrate judge, or you may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding consent will not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise be involved with your case.

Consent to a magistrate judge's authority. The following parties ☐ Consent / ☐ Do Not Consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 73.1, if (and only if) all parties have consented to the reference to a magistrate judge, then Plaintiff shall file the consent form(s) in paper format at the Clerk's Office.

Printed Names___

Signatures of all parties and counsel for all parties___

Dates___

REFERENCE ORDER

IT IS ORDERED: This case is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler, to conduct all proceedings and order entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, and CivLR 73.1.

___Date

___United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jacobo v. Hernandez

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Oct 4, 2021
21-cv-1113-JLS-AGS (S.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Jacobo v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:Luis JACOBO, Plaintiff, v. Rogelio HERNANDEZ, Nicholas Uhde, Christian…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Oct 4, 2021

Citations

21-cv-1113-JLS-AGS (S.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2021)