From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Wray

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Oct 24, 2023
Civil Action 3:23-CV-0558-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:23-CV-0558-M-BH

10-24-2023

NAKISHA JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER WRAY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

BARBARA M.G. LYNN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Charter Communications, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) , filed May 9, 2023 (doc. 9), and Apple, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, filed May 12, 2023 (doc. 13), are both GRANTED. By separate judgment, the plaintiff's claims against Charter Communications, Inc. and Apple, Inc. will be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Wray

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Oct 24, 2023
Civil Action 3:23-CV-0558-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Jackson v. Wray

Case Details

Full title:NAKISHA JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER WRAY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Oct 24, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 3:23-CV-0558-M-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2023)