From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Walker

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Oct 23, 2006
No. 04-CV-160-DRH (S.D. Ill. Oct. 23, 2006)

Opinion

No. 04-CV-160-DRH.

October 23, 2006


ORDER


On June 5, 2006, Plaintiff Adrian L. Jackson ("Plaintiff") filed a motion for default judgment (Doc. 25). Specifically, Plaintiff claimed that the clerk entered a default judgment against Defendants on April 25, 2006 due to their failure to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. ( Id.) This matter comes before the Court on a Report and Recommendation ("the Report") filed by United States Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier on July 17, 2006. (Doc. 32.) Magistrate Judge Frazier's Report recommends that Plaintiff's motion be denied.

Under Rule 73.1 of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Illinois, the parties had ten days in which to serve and file written objections to the Report. As of this date, no objections have been filed. The period in which to file objections has expired. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court need not conduct de novo review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Frazier's Report (Doc. 32) and DENIES Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 25).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Walker

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
Oct 23, 2006
No. 04-CV-160-DRH (S.D. Ill. Oct. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Jackson v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN L. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. ROGER E. WALKER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Illinois

Date published: Oct 23, 2006

Citations

No. 04-CV-160-DRH (S.D. Ill. Oct. 23, 2006)