Jackson v. U.S.

Full title: ANDREW LORENZO JACKSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 31, 2006

Case No. 2:05-CV-387, Crim. No. 2:04-CR-041 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 31, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-CV-387, Crim. No. 2:04-CR-041.

January 31, 2006

OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES GRAHAM, District Judge

On January 4, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be dismissed. Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Doc. No. 32. Petitioner objects to all of the Magistrate Judge's recommendations and conclusions. Petitioner again raises all of the same arguments that were previously presented. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation objected to by petitioner. For the reasons discussed at length in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.