From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Syngenta Crop Prot., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jul 1, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-581-SDD-SCR (M.D. La. Jul. 1, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-581-SDD-SCR

07-01-2013

ROSHAUNDA JACKSON, ETAL v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC, ET AL


RULING

The Court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Stephen C. Riedlinger dated June 11, 2013. Plaintiffs have filed an objection which the Court has considered.

The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

Accordingly, the Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiffs Roshaunda Jackson, individually and on behalf of her minor child Jackson Cayden Dukes, and Cornell Dukes is hereby denied.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, July 1,2013.

______________________

SHELLY D. DICK, DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Jackson v. Syngenta Crop Prot., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jul 1, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-581-SDD-SCR (M.D. La. Jul. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Jackson v. Syngenta Crop Prot., LLC

Case Details

Full title:ROSHAUNDA JACKSON, ETAL v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jul 1, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-581-SDD-SCR (M.D. La. Jul. 1, 2013)

Citing Cases

Deggs v. Fives Bronx, Inc.

The performance of these alleged duties, however, would be general responsibility associated with DeLacerda's…