From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 29, 1992
599 So. 2d 275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-02618.

May 29, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands County, J. Dale Durrance, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and David A. Snyder, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The trial court imposed a sentence which exceeds the permissible range of the sentencing guidelines, without giving written reasons for the departure. We reverse and remand for resentencing. At the time of sentencing, the trial court did not know that the sentence imposed was a departure sentence. Accordingly, on remand the court may again depart from the guidelines if valid written reasons for departure are given. See State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla. 1990).

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 29, 1992
599 So. 2d 275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH ANTHONY JACKSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 29, 1992

Citations

599 So. 2d 275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Trotter v. State

However, the trial court may depart from the guidelines if valid reasons for departure are given, because it…