Opinion
No. ED 98576.
2013-05-14
Michael L. JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Michael P. David, Judge. Edward Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Gregory Barnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Michael P. David, Judge.
Edward Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Gregory Barnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Jackson (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).