From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 17, 1974
301 So. 2d 490 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

No. U-402.

October 17, 1974.

Petition for review from the Circuit Court, Putnam County, E.L. Eastmoore, J.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Gerry B. Rose, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction and sentence after being found guilty by a jury of manslaughter.

We note at the outset that appellant's notice of appeal from the final judgment was not timely filed. This Court thus having no jurisdiction to proceed under said appeal, we sua sponte dismiss the same. However, it appearing from the petition for writ of habeas corpus that the delay was a result of State inaction, we hereby grant to petitioner-appellant a "Hollingshead Appeal" (Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 194 So.2d 577 (Fla. 1967)), and will proceed to consider this cause on the merits under this Court's original Case No. U-402, which is hereby reinstated.

We have carefully reviewed the entire record on appeal and the briefs submitted by counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the proceedings below, particularly with reference to the admittance into evidence of two incriminatory statements made by appellant. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed herein is affirmed.

JOHNSON, Acting C.J., and SPECTOR and BOYER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 17, 1974
301 So. 2d 490 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:HENRY D. JACKSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 17, 1974

Citations

301 So. 2d 490 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Citing Cases

Byrd v. State

DAUKSCH, Judge. We have no jurisdiction to consider the appeal because Appellant appealed only from the…