From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 31, 2021
2021-UP-098 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-098

03-31-2021

Tre'Vaughn Jackson, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2017-001172

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Assistant Attorney General Brianna Lynn Schill, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted February 1, 2021

Appeal From Sumter County Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Assistant Attorney General Brianna Lynn Schill, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration of the Petition, Appendix, and briefs, we dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 31, 2021
2021-UP-098 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tre'Vaughn Jackson, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 31, 2021

Citations

2021-UP-098 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2021)