From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Slovin & Assocs.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Jun 30, 2023
1:22-cv-310 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 30, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-310

06-30-2023

ROBERT LEE JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. SLOVIN & ASSOCIATES LPA, et al., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 9) and TERMINATING CASE

MATTHEW W. McFARLAND, JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 9), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). No objections to the Report have been filed. The time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Recommendation and ORDERS:

(1) This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for want of prosecution under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

(2) The Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that, for the reasons expressed in the Report, an appeal of this Order adopting the Report would not be taken in good faith, and therefore DENIES plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds, Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199,203 (2007). Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals.

Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800,803 (6th Cir. 1999).

(3) This matter is TERMINATED from the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Slovin & Assocs.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Jun 30, 2023
1:22-cv-310 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Jackson v. Slovin & Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEE JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. SLOVIN & ASSOCIATES LPA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Jun 30, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-310 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 30, 2023)