From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 27, 2012
2012-1680 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 27, 2012)

Opinion

2012-1680

12-27-2012

DAVID JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AND LYNETTE A. ROFF, DIRECTOR, VA EASTERN COLORADO HCS, Defendants-Appellees.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in case no. 10-CV-2596, Judge Marcia S. Krieger.

Before NEWMAN, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

This appeal concerns an order of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado dismissing David Jackson's complaint alleging various claims regarding the Privacy Act against the Department of Veterans Affairs and denying several motions including leave to replead. Because the district court's jurisdiction did not arise in whole or in part under the laws governing this court's limited appellate jurisdiction, we are without authority to entertain this appeal. Since the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has already received and docketed the matter, dismissal rather than transfer of the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 is appropriate.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
(3) All other motions are denied as moot.

FOR THE COURT

________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s26


Summaries of

Jackson v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 27, 2012
2012-1680 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Jackson v. Shinseki

Case Details

Full title:DAVID JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 27, 2012

Citations

2012-1680 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 27, 2012)