From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

JACKSON v. ROHM HAAS COMPANY

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 6, 2011
Civil Action No. 05-4988 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-4988.

April 6, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2011, upon consideration of the motion of Lori Hamlin and Nancy Mayo for an injunction and/or to hold Mark Jackson in contempt, see Docket No. 260, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell, to which Hamlin and Mayo have not objected, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 264) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. Lori Hamlin and Nancy Mayo's motion for an injunction and/or to hold Mark Jackson in contempt (Docket No. 260) is DENIED.


Summaries of

JACKSON v. ROHM HAAS COMPANY

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 6, 2011
Civil Action No. 05-4988 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 6, 2011)
Case details for

JACKSON v. ROHM HAAS COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:MARK JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. ROHM HAAS COMPANY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 6, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-4988 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 6, 2011)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Dow Chem. Co.

Plaintiff's only other effort to distinguish his current claims from his prior claims is to argue that Judge…