From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Prison

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Nov 19, 2009
3:09-cv-00112-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2009)

Opinion

3:09-cv-00112-LRH (VPC).

November 19, 2009


ORDER


The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#10) entered on May 15, 2009, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction (#1) be denied and the case be dismissed without prejudice.

Refers to court's docket number.

On May 28, 2009, Plaintiff filed a motion for enlargement of time to file objections (#12) and Defendant filed its non-opposition to Plaintiff's motion (#14) on June 9, 2009. Since then, no objections have been filed and the only document received by the court from Plaintiff is a rambling letter (#15) with similar complaints as were considered by the Magistrate Judge. The telephonic hearing requested in such letter (#15) is therefore denied. No sufficient grounds or objections have been presented by Plaintiff that would cause the court not to accept the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#10).

The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby

ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#10); therefore, Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction (#1) is denied and this case is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the telephonic hearing requested in Plaintiff's letter (#15) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Prison

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Nov 19, 2009
3:09-cv-00112-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Jackson v. Prison

Case Details

Full title:ALFONSO JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. ELY STATE PRISON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Nov 19, 2009

Citations

3:09-cv-00112-LRH (VPC) (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2009)

Citing Cases

Reed v. Dixon

The trial court should have given appellant's requested charge. Cf. State Hwy. Dept. v. Davis, 129 Ga. App.…

McDuffie v. Tanner

Further, the words "ordinary care" are self-explanatory, and failure to define their meaning, in absence of…