From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Portuondo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 2001
288 A.D.2d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

November 21, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Nathaniel Jackson, Wallkill, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Laura Etlinger of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and, Mugglin, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from attempting to smuggle drugs into the facility and failing to comply with facility correspondence procedures. The misbehavior report relates that petitioner attempted to mail a letter which contained a secret code that, when deciphered, communicated a request that the addressee of the letter provide him with drugs in exchange for money when she came to visit him at the facility.

We confirm. Initially, we find that, notwithstanding petitioner's assertions to the contrary, the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed to apprise petitioner of the charges against him and afforded him the opportunity to prepare a defense (see, Matter of Lamage v. Goord, 285 A.D.2d 724; Matter of Seegars v. Goord, 245 A.D.2d 640, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 811). Moreover, we conclude that the misbehavior report, together with the evidence adduced at the hearing, including petitioner's own admissions concerning the letter, constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Abdur-Raheem v. Mann, 85 N.Y.2d 113, 119; Matter of Green v. McGinnis, 262 A.D.2d 897, lv dismissed 94 N.Y.2d 931). Likewise, we are unpersuaded that the Hearing Officer was biased or improperly conducted his own investigation into the charges against petitioner (see, Matter of Caroselli v. Goord, 274 A.D.2d 903). Petitioner's remaining arguments have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Portuondo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 2001
288 A.D.2d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Jackson v. Portuondo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NATHANIEL JACKSON, Petitioner, v. LEONARD PORTUONDO, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 741

Citing Cases

Watkins v. Goord

We conclude that substantial evidence supported the determination of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of…

In the Matter of McFadden v. Armmitage

Although the nurse involved in the incident testified that the threat was not directed toward her, she…