From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Khalib

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2023
1:20-cv-01567-ADA-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01567-ADA-SKO (PC)

06-06-2023

CORNEL JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. KHALIB, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR AND STAYING CASE FOR 90 DAYS

FORTY-FIVE (45) DAY DEADLINE

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Cornel Jackson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter proceeds on Plaintiff's retaliation claims against Defendants Khela, Quick, Villanueva, Lesage, Alva, Townsend, Rivera, and Garza, and an equal protection clause violation against Defendant Garza, as alleged in Plaintiff's first amended complaint. (See Docs. 14 & 16.) On June 2, 2023, Defendants filed an answer to Plaintiff's first amended complaint. (Doc. 29.)

Defendant's surname is Khela, rather than “Khalib” as identified by Plaintiff.

The Court refers all civil rights cases filed by pro se inmates to Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) to attempt to resolve such cases more expeditiously and less expensively. No claims, defenses, or objections are waived by the parties' participation.

The Court stays this action for ninety days to allow the parties to investigate Plaintiff's claims, meet and confer, and participate in an early settlement conference. The Court presumes that all post-screening civil rights cases assigned to the undersigned will proceed to a settlement conference. However, if, after investigating Plaintiff's claims and meeting and conferring, either party finds that a settlement conference would be a waste of resources, the party may opt out of the early settlement conference.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. This action is STAYED for ninety (90) days to allow the parties an opportunity to settle their dispute before the discovery process begins. No pleadings or motions may be filed in this case during the stay. The parties shall not engage in formal discovery, but they may engage in informal discovery to prepare for the settlement conference.

2. Within forty-five (45) days from the date of this order, the parties SHALL file the attached notice, indicating their agreement to proceed to an early settlement conference or their belief that settlement is not achievable at this time.

3. Within sixty (60) days from the date of this order, if all parties elect to proceed to an early settlement conference, defense counsel SHALL contact the undersigned's Courtroom Deputy at wkusamura@caed.uscourts.gov to schedule the settlement conference.

4. If the parties reach a settlement during the stay of this action, they SHALL file a Notice of Settlement as required by Local Rule 160.

5. The parties must keep the Court informed of their current addresses during the stay and the pendency of this action. Changes of address must be reported promptly in a Notice of Change of Address. See L.R. 182(f).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NOTICE REGARDING EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

The party or counsel agrees that an early settlement conference would be productive and wishes to engage in an early settlement conference.

Yes ___ No___

Dated:

___________Plaintiff or Counsel for Defendants


Summaries of

Jackson v. Khalib

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 6, 2023
1:20-cv-01567-ADA-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Jackson v. Khalib

Case Details

Full title:CORNEL JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. KHALIB, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 6, 2023

Citations

1:20-cv-01567-ADA-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2023)