From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION
Mar 20, 2013
CV 112-159 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 20, 2013)

Opinion

CV 112-159

03-20-2013

ANDRE MAURICE JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. PETER D. JOHNSON, Attorney, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and this civil action is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED 20th day of March, 2013, at Augusta, Georgia.

_________________

HONORABLE J. RANDAL HALL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA


Summaries of

Jackson v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION
Mar 20, 2013
CV 112-159 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Jackson v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE MAURICE JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. PETER D. JOHNSON, Attorney, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 20, 2013

Citations

CV 112-159 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 20, 2013)

Citing Cases

Fredrick v. Cavender

"While Younger involved a federal suit seeking equitable relief in the form of an injunction of the ongoing…