From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Griffith

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2022
1:20-cv-00073-DAD-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00073-DAD-SKO (PC)

09-28-2022

FRED JAY JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. L. D. GRIFFITH, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING (Doc. 33)

SHEILA K. OBERTO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On September 21, 2022, Defendant Lyle D. Griffith, M.D., filed a request for extension of time within which to respond to Plaintiff's second amended complaint. (Doc. 33.) The request is supported by the declaration of Stacy R. Lucas. (Id.)

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court grants Defendant an extension of time until October 27, 2022, to respond to Plaintiff's second amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Griffith

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2022
1:20-cv-00073-DAD-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Jackson v. Griffith

Case Details

Full title:FRED JAY JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. L. D. GRIFFITH, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2022

Citations

1:20-cv-00073-DAD-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2022)