From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Foster

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-2145 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-2145 CKD P

10-28-2015

CHARLES A. JACKSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. JOHN FOSTER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3) is denied. Dated: October 28, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1/md
jack2145.31


Summaries of

Jackson v. Foster

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-2145 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Jackson v. Foster

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES A. JACKSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. JOHN FOSTER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 28, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-2145 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2015)