From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Dayton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 17, 2018
Civil No. 18-1525 (DWF/HB) (D. Minn. Jul. 17, 2018)

Opinion

Civil No. 18-1525 (DWF/HB)

07-17-2018

Howard G. Jackson, Plaintiff, v. Mark Dayton, Governor of Minnesota, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer dated June 18, 2018. (Doc. No. 5.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:

ORDER

1. Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's June 18, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [5]) is ADOPTED.

2. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. The application to proceed in forma pauperis of Plaintiff Howard G. Jackson (Doc. No. [2]) is DENIED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: July 17, 2018

s/Donovan W. Frank

DONOVAN W. FRANK

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jackson v. Dayton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 17, 2018
Civil No. 18-1525 (DWF/HB) (D. Minn. Jul. 17, 2018)
Case details for

Jackson v. Dayton

Case Details

Full title:Howard G. Jackson, Plaintiff, v. Mark Dayton, Governor of Minnesota…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jul 17, 2018

Citations

Civil No. 18-1525 (DWF/HB) (D. Minn. Jul. 17, 2018)