From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-3070 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-3070 EFB P

01-03-2013

DONALD R. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, petitioner has commenced this action in the wrong district.

Petitioner was convicted in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, but is confined at California State Prison Solano. Although this court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted both have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484, 499-500 (1973), witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in the county of conviction, id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Therefore, the court takes no action on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis, and transfers this action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 28 U.S.C. §§ 84(c); 1404(a).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

_______________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Jackson v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-3070 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Jackson v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:DONALD R. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 3, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-3070 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2013)