From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Allstate Vehicle & Prop. Ins. Co.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Oct 2, 2017
Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-00988 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-00988

10-02-2017

PAUL JACKSON AND KIM JACKSON, v. ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY


(Judge Mazzant/Judge Johnson) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 13, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #38) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #27) be denied.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant's motion (Dkt. #27) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 2nd day of October, 2017.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jackson v. Allstate Vehicle & Prop. Ins. Co.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Oct 2, 2017
Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-00988 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Jackson v. Allstate Vehicle & Prop. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL JACKSON AND KIM JACKSON, v. ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 2, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-00988 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2017)

Citing Cases

Slaughter v. Walmart, Inc.

(“To the extent Defendant seeks a ‘no evidence' summary judgment under Tex.R.Civ.P. 166a(i), that request…