From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackim v. State

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Dec 3, 2007
Case No. 1:07cv3139 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 3, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07cv3139.

December 3, 2007


ORDER


On 10/12/2007, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Dkt. # 1). The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Nancy A. Vecchiarelli pursuant to Local Rule 72.2 (Dkt. # 6). On 11/09/2007, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Petitioner's application for habeas corpus be denied (Dkt. #20).

FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within ten (10) days after service, but Petitioner has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Petitioner is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Therefore, Magistrate Judge Vecchiarelli's report and recommendation is ADOPTED and Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt. # 1) is DENIED.

Furthermore, the court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jackim v. State

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Dec 3, 2007
Case No. 1:07cv3139 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 3, 2007)
Case details for

Jackim v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE A. JACKIM Petitioner, v. STATE OF OHIO, RICHARD J. AMBROSE Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: Dec 3, 2007

Citations

Case No. 1:07cv3139 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 3, 2007)