From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jack Feagin Electric v. Hallmark

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 4, 2005
894 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

In Hallmark, this court reversed the JCC's award of TPD benefits because the claimant failed to submit the DWC–19 form. Hallmark made no mention, however, of whether the employer/carrier had provided to the claimant the forms referenced in the Florida Administrative Code, but reversed the JCC's award of the claimed benefits because the claimant had not returned the forms.

Summary of this case from Perdue v. Sebring Marine Ind. Inc.

Opinion

No. 1D04-3203.

March 4, 2005.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims, Judge Jonathan D. Ohlman.

Lori M. Little, Esquire, Edward T. LeFever, P.A., Ocala, for Appellant.

Lynne M. Shigo, Esquire, Avera Avera, P.A., Gainesville, and Sharon H. Proctor, Esquire, Avon Lake, OH, for Appellee.


The Employer/Carrier (E/C) appeal the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims which found Claimant entitled to temporary partial disability (TPD) benefits for time periods for which he failed to submit employee earning report (DWC-19) forms, and for awarding Claimant's attorney a fee for securing these benefits. Although the JCC held the E/C was not required to pay benefits for these time periods until the Claimant filled out and returned the forms, the JCC erred by finding the benefits due and owing and awarding fees, before the forms were submitted. Accordingly, we reverse.

Rule 38F-3.0191(9), Florida Administrative Code (2001), in pertinent part, provides:

The carrier may require information from the employee concerning the employee's receipt of wages, unemployment compensation benefits, or Social Security benefits by sending the employee a copy of Form DWC-19, pursuant to Section 440.15(8), (10) and (11), F.S. . . . If the employee does not mail the completed form to the carrier within 21 days after the employee's receipt of Form DWC-19, the carrier may suspend temporary partial compensation benefits until it receives the form. Id. (emphasis added). Based on the plain language of the rule, a carrier may suspend TPD benefits until it receives an employee's completed Form DWC-19. Here, because the JCC expressly found Claimant had not submitted the forms at the time of the hearing, TPD benefits were not due and owing. In fact, unless the forms are completed and returned, benefits may never be due and owing. Because the benefits requested were not due and owing at the time of the final hearing, and may never be due and owing, Claimant's attorney did not secure a benefit for Claimant.

REVERSED and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

KAHN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jack Feagin Electric v. Hallmark

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 4, 2005
894 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

In Hallmark, this court reversed the JCC's award of TPD benefits because the claimant failed to submit the DWC–19 form. Hallmark made no mention, however, of whether the employer/carrier had provided to the claimant the forms referenced in the Florida Administrative Code, but reversed the JCC's award of the claimed benefits because the claimant had not returned the forms.

Summary of this case from Perdue v. Sebring Marine Ind. Inc.

In Hallmark, this court reversed the JCC's award of TPD benefits because the claimant failed to submit the DWC-19 form. Hallmark made no mention, however, of whether the employer/carrier had provided to the claimant the forms referenced in the Florida Administrative Code, but reversed the JCC's award of the claimed benefits because the claimant had not returned the forms.

Summary of this case from Perdue v. Sebring Marine Ind.
Case details for

Jack Feagin Electric v. Hallmark

Case Details

Full title:JACK FEAGIN ELECTRIC, INC., and AMCOMP Preferred, Appellant, v. Jeff…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 4, 2005

Citations

894 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Republic Waste Servs. v. Ricardo

The judge of compensation claims found that the claimant did not submit DWC–19 “Employee Earnings Report”…

Republic Waste Serv. Inc. v. Ricardo

The judge of compensation claims found that the claimant did not submit DWC-19 "Employee Earnings Report"…