From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jabre v. US Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Apr 9, 2012
Civil No. 11-cv-332-JL (D.N.H. Apr. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-cv-332-JL

04-09-2012

Ryann Jabre v. US Social Security Administration


ORDER

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated April 5, 2012, no objection having been filed. "'[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.''' School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

SO ORDERED.

_________

Joseph N. Laplante

Chief Judge

cc: Michael D. Seaton, Esq.

Gretchen Leah Witt, AUSA


Summaries of

Jabre v. US Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Apr 9, 2012
Civil No. 11-cv-332-JL (D.N.H. Apr. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Jabre v. US Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:Ryann Jabre v. US Social Security Administration

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Apr 9, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 11-cv-332-JL (D.N.H. Apr. 9, 2012)

Citing Cases

Ouellette v. Berryhill

Accordingly, when assessing a claimant's RFC, the general rule is that an expert is needed to assess the…

Ell v. Berryhill

Thus, an expert's RFC evaluation is required where the record is sufficiently ramified that understanding it…