J & J Sports Production, Inc. v. Tamayo

Full title: J & J SPORTS PRODUCTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. JULIO TAMAYO, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 7, 2015

2:14-cv-1997 KJM CKD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2015)

Opinion

J & J SPORTS PRODUCTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. JULIO TAMAYO, et al., Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-1997 KJM CKD United States District Court, E.D. California. October 7, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         This matter was referred to the magistrate judge for pretrial management because defendants were proceeding pro se. See Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defense counsel has now substituted in for defendants. Because defendants are now represented by counsel, pretrial matters, other than discovery motions, should now be noticed before the District Judge assigned to this action. The magistrate judge shall continue to perform all duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20).

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action;

         2. All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated; and

         3. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in this action shall be No. 2:14-cv-1997 KJM CKD.