Opinion
February 1, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.).
Res judicata bars plaintiff's relitigation of the same facts which could have been presented in the prior CPLR article 78 proceeding (see, O'Brien v. City of Syracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353, 357). Plaintiff's contention that he did not receive effective assistance of counsel does not serve to vitiate the transactional analysis approach in determining when two claims are identical for purposes of applying the res judicata bar (see, Matter of Hodes v. Axelrod, 70 N.Y.2d 364, 372-373; compare, Schwartz v Public Adm'r of County of Bronx, 24 N.Y.2d 65, 72).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Rubin and Tom, JJ.