From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IVEY v. STATE

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division
May 13, 2008
C/A No.: 0:07-cv-4025-GRA-BM (D.S.C. May. 13, 2008)

Opinion

C/A No.: 0:07-cv-4025-GRA-BM.

May 13, 2008


ORDER (Written Opinion)


This matter comes before the Court for a review of the magistrate's Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2)(d), D.S.C., filed April 1, 2008. Plaintiff originally filed this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking a permanent injunction prohibiting his execution. Defendant State of South Carolina filed a motion to dismiss based on the Eleventh Amendment. The magistrate recommends granting Defendant South Carolina's motion.

The magistrate makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and responsibility for making a final determination remains with this Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). This Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and this Court may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court may also "receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate with instructions." Id. In the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198 (4th. Cir. 1983). Plaintiff did not file any objections.

After a thorough review of the motion to dismiss, the Report and Recommendation, and the relevant case law, this Court finds that the magistrate applied sound legal principles to the facts of this case. Therefore, this Court adopts the magistrate's Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

IT IS THEREFORE SO ORDERED THAT Defendant State of South Carolina's motion to dismiss be GRANTED and that the State of South Carolina be DISMISSED as a defendant in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

Pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has the right to appeal this Order within thirty (30) days from the date of its entry. Failure to meet this deadline, as modified by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, will waive the right to appeal.


Summaries of

IVEY v. STATE

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division
May 13, 2008
C/A No.: 0:07-cv-4025-GRA-BM (D.S.C. May. 13, 2008)
Case details for

IVEY v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:Thomas Treshawn Ivey, Plaintiff, v. State of South Carolina, a…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division

Date published: May 13, 2008

Citations

C/A No.: 0:07-cv-4025-GRA-BM (D.S.C. May. 13, 2008)