From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iurato v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 10, 2005
18 A.D.3d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

4487.

May 10, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.), entered August 1, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion of third-party defendant Abax, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing all claims against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Nardelli and Williams, JJ., concur.


Abax's motion for summary judgment dismissing all claims against it was properly denied insofar as it has not been established which party placed the plastic underneath the ladder. If a jury determines that the general contractor's culpability is vicarious only, it may be entitled to contractual indemnification from Abax ( De La Rosa v. Philip Morris Mgt. Corp., 303 AD2d 190, 193). The motion is thus premature with respect to contractual indemnification, since there has been no determination as to the proximate cause of injury or who was liable for the accident ( cf. id.).

We have considered Abax's remaining arguments and find them without merit.


Summaries of

Iurato v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 10, 2005
18 A.D.3d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Iurato v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS M. IURATO et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 10, 2005

Citations

18 A.D.3d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
793 N.Y.S.2d 915

Citing Cases

Koy Than v. BNY Constr. Inc.

Absent a finding of liability, dismissal of the Tham's cross claims for indemnification is premature. (See…

SANG HWAN OH v. 358-74 VERNON AVE.

employees of any of them from and against claims, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to…