From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Italian Art Exhibit Committee v. Romeo

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 6, 1932
143 So. 557 (Ala. 1932)

Opinion

6 Div. 183.

October 6, 1932.

Appeal from County Court of Common Claims, Jefferson County; E. N. Hamill, Judge.

J. Reese Murray, of Birmingham, for appellants.

Unless Wheeler was the authorized agent of the committee, or if, being unauthorized, he made an agreement with appellee, unless the committee ratified the same, the committee would not be bound thereby. There can be no ratification unless it is deliberately made with full knowledge of the material facts. Blevins v. Pope, 7 Ala. 371; Clealand v. Walker, 11 Ala. 1058, 46 Am. Dec. 238; Moore v. Robinson, 62 Ala. 537. It does not appear from count 3 of the complaint whether the contract sued on was in writing. The demurrer to this count should have been sustained. Goodwin v. Adler, 220 Ala. 69, 124 So. 108. A single member had no power to bind the association in absence of specific authority. Agency of Wheeler was not proved, and the motion for a new trial should have been granted. 5 C. J. 1334, 1361; Ebersole v. So. Bldg. Asso., 147 Ala. 177, 41 So. 150; 2 C. J. 561, 570; Fulton v. Sword Med. Co., 145 Ala. 331, 40 So. 393.

Parsons Cowherd, of Birmingham, for appellee.

No damage results from failing to sustain demurrer to one count when there are other counts that would support a judgment. 34 C. J. 566; 5 Cyc. Pl. Pr. 337; 6 Cyc. Pl. Pr. 327. Judgment properly went for plaintiff, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.


The appellee sued the appellants, individually, and as members of the Italian Art Exhibit Committee, upon the common counts, and a special count on contract, for the recovery of a sum claimed to be due for services rendered. The Italian Art Exhibit Committee, of which defendants were members, were putting on a pageant in Birmingham in promotion of an Italian Art Exhibit. Plaintiff was employed to furnish band music for the pageant. Without dispute it was agreed that he should be paid $135 for furnishing music for the pageant and one dress rehearsal, which sum was paid. Plaintiff sues for an additional sum of $290, claimed to be due for furnishing music at several extra rehearsals at the rate of $27 per hour. The trial court gave judgment for $265. The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain this judgment is the substantial question here presented.

The evidence fully sustains a finding that defendant Wheeler, a member of the committee, did agree to pay the sum claimed for extra rehearsals, that he authorized the director of the pageant to use the band in as many rehearsals as desired, and that music was furnished as claimed. There was no error in rendering judgment as to him. The chief argument is directed to Wheeler's authority to bind the other members of the committee for this further obligation, and the question of ratification of his action by his associates. These questions are not presented for review. The appeal was taken jointly by all the defendants and there is a joint assignment of errors only.

By long-settled rules a joint assignment of errors is unavailing unless the errors are injurious to all who join therein. Roberts v. Kemp, 218 Ala. 350, 352, 118 So. 656; Chavers v. Mayo, 202 Ala. 128, 130, 79 So. 594; Hall v. First Bank of Crossville, 196 Ala. 627, 72 So. 171; Mobile Temperance Hall Ass'n v. Holmes, 195 Ala. 437, 70 So. 640.

The demand presented by the evidence was clearly recoverable under the common counts. Overruling the demurrer to the count on contract, questioning the sufficiency of the count for failure to allege whether the contract was verbal or in writing, if error, was without injury.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Italian Art Exhibit Committee v. Romeo

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 6, 1932
143 So. 557 (Ala. 1932)
Case details for

Italian Art Exhibit Committee v. Romeo

Case Details

Full title:ITALIAN ART EXHIBIT COMMITTEE et al. v. ROMEO

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Oct 6, 1932

Citations

143 So. 557 (Ala. 1932)
143 So. 557

Citing Cases

Waters v. Employers Life Insurance Co. of America

An illustration in principle appears in our holding that a joint assignment of errors is unavailable to…